Casio FX-P401- User Manual

Casio FX-P401

Casio FX-P401– User Manual, read for free online in PDF format. We hope this helps you resolve any issues you may have. If you have further questions, please contact us through the contact form.

1 Page 1
2 Page 2
3 Page 3
4 Page 4
5 Page 5
6 Page 6
7 Page 7
8 Page 8
9 Page 9
10 Page 10
11 Page 11
12 Page 12
13 Page 13
14 Page 14
15 Page 15
16 Page 16
17 Page 17
18 Page 18
19 Page 19
20 Page 20
21 Page 21
22 Page 22
23 Page 23
Page: / 23

Table of Contents:

  • Page 2 – Specific problems with conventional calculators; without reporting an error
  • Page 3 – lb; lu
  • Page 4 – Variations in syntax for combinations.; is simply entered as; the simplest to the most complex equations.”
  • Page 5 – Systematic problems; Numerical problems
  • Page 6 – Rearrangement; same; Chain calculations
  • Page 7 – Modes; does; that; No undo, and feeble correction
  • Page 8 – Poor manuals; require; Hyperbole; Summary of problems, and a new approach; more a
  • Page 9 – The basic solution
  • Page 11 – Worked examples
  • Page 12 – Elements; Temperature conversion; any; Other features; ‘Scientific’ functions
  • Page 13 – Calculators with a large screen; kπ
  • Page 14 – Preferences for powerful calculations; exactly as if it
  • Page 15 – Constants and standard formulæ; Sound and errors; beep if pressing a key does not cause
  • Page 16 – Undo and editing; write; Arbitrary limitations; far
  • Page 17 – Other important design details; Also; Possible ob jections to the new calculator; The display changes too much; doesn’t
  • Page 18 – The calculator as a ‘chalk board.’; The display is not big enough
  • Page 19 – Non-specific complaints; what; Possible developments; and indeed one that the user
  • Page 20 – exactly; Going b eyond the handheld paradigm
  • Page 21 – Conclusions; key is a case in point.; References; , Approved translation of
  • Page 22 – Acknowledgements
  • Page 23 – and
Loading the manual

A new calculator and why it is necessary

Harold Thimbleby

Computing Science

Middlesex University

LONDON, N11 2NQ.

Email:

[email protected]

September 30, 1998

Abstract

Conventional calculators are badly designed: they suffer from bad computer science — they are
unnecessarily difficult to use and buggy. I describe a solution, avoiding the problems caused by
conventional calculators, one that is more powerful and arguably much easier to use. The solution
has been implemented, and design issues are discussed.

This pap er shows an interactive system that is declarative, with the advantages of clarity and

power that entails. It frees people from working out

how

a calculation should be expressed to con-

centrating on

what

they want solved. An imp ortant contribution is to demonstrate the very serious

problems users face when using conventional calculators, and hence what a freedom a declarative
design brings.

1

Introduction

Pocket calculators have been around for decades, and it is easy to take their design for granted. (Even
powerful computer systems simulate desktop calculators because of their familiarity and presumed ease
of use.) However, conventional calculators are in fact poorly conceived: calculators made by market
leaders are egregious, buggy and, in many cases, bizarre. This unfortunate state of affairs may be
blamed on the arbitrariness permitted by imperative styles of design, which has enabled the uncontrolled
accretion of incoherent, partial and undefined features, possibly motivated by na¨ıve market forces. After
substantiating these claims, this paper exhibits a new, clear calculator design that solves the identified
problems and that has additional advantages. Thus I show the problems are technically avoidable. The
new design is distinctively declarative; it demonstrates the supremacy of a declarative approach over
the conventional

ad hoc

imperative approach. (The approach can be generalised to applications other

than arithmetic but that is not my purp ose here.)

My credit card agreement states that, “Interest is calculated on a daily basis at the rate of 1

.

585%

per month.” If I have

£

276 credit for a week, how much interest do I pay? This question involves

financial background knowledge, but consider the following direct arithmetic problem, which requires a
similar level of mathematical skill to solve: “What power of 2 is 100?” and let us suppose we will use a
conventional hand-held calculator to find the answer. The question is not in a form that is immediately
acceptable, even in conventional symbols: 2

x

= 100. Although calculators typically have a key for

raising to a p ower, it cannot be used for this sum because it assumes

x

is given, whereas here it is

required to be calculated. Instead, the problem has to be compiled by the user to

x

= log 100

/

log 2

and then to the particular button presses for a calculator, e.g.,

C

1

0

0

log

/

2

log

=

. This

sequence of key presses has very little resemblance to the original problem. (A similar effort is required
for a reverse Polish calculator.)

More generally, the task of the user is to transform their problem into an appropriate sequence of

commands that culminate in the calculator displaying the required answer. To do this correctly the
semantics of the keys and their combinations must be well defined, ideally sensible and memorable.

Thus pressing

0

multiplies the display by 10 (when displaying less than 8 digits, when not following a

This work was supported by EPSRC Grant No. GR/J43110.

1

"Loading the manual" means you need to wait until the file loads and becomes available for online reading. Some manuals are very large, and the time they take to appear depends on your internet speed.

Summary

Page 2 - Specific problems with conventional calculators; without reporting an error

decimal point, when not in an error condition . . . ). Furthermore, as users may make slips — pressing the wrong button, omitting a press, or pressing a button twice in succession by accident — the intermediatedisplays of the calculator should confirm progress and, where an error occurs, help the us...

Page 3 - lb; lu

All might be harmless design variation, except manufacturers’ claims suggest otherwise, as the following typical example from a market leader makes clear: “Thanks to V.P.A.M. (Visually Perfect Algebraic Metho d) calculations have become a lot easier.It may sound confusing, but all it means is that t...

Page 4 - Variations in syntax for combinations.; is simply entered as; the simplest to the most complex equations.”

Model 4 × − 5 ; 1 − 5 % ; 1 + 5 % Notes Canon WS-121H − 1 − 80 † 1 . 05 † 1 + 5 ± % calcu- lates 0 . 95. Casio MS-70 l − 1 − 80 1 . 0526315 Casio MS-270 l − 1 − 80 1 . 05 ‡ ‡ 1 . 0526315 displayed in a 2 decimal digit mode. Casio JW-8L − 1 0 . 95 1 . 05 Casio fx-85 vh − 1 − 80 120 Casio fx-P401 − 20...

Other Casio Models