Asus M2NBP-VM-CSM- User Manual
Asus M2NBP-VM-CSM– User Manual, read for free online in PDF format. We hope this helps you resolve any issues you may have. If you have further questions, please contact us through the contact form.
Table of Contents:
- Page 3 – Application scenarios; Viewing a set of memorized reports in Intuit QuickBooks Pro 2006
- Page 4 – Running a Monte Carlo simulation in Microsoft Office Excel 2007; Microsoft® Excel®: Data Analysis and Business Modeling
- Page 5 – Test results and analysis
- Page 6 – Com m unica tions a nd Colla bora tion sce na rio
- Page 7 – Viewing data in Intuit QuickBooks Pro 2006; PERFORMANCE RESULTS; Intuit QuickBooks sce na rio
- Page 8 – Ex ce l re ca lcula tion sce na rio
- Page 9 – Monte Ca rlo sim ula tion
- Page 10 – Choppy - The system paused between; Poor video quality - Obvious video
- Page 11 – Test methodology; Setting up the test systems; Installing Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate; Install Windows Vista Ultimate Build 6000.
- Page 13 – Turn off display after; Installing Adobe Flash Player 9.0; Install Adobe Flash Player 9 from; Installing Intuit QuickBooks Pro 2006; Insert the Intuit QuickBooks Pro 2006 installation CD.
- Page 15 – Setting up the test network
- Page 16 – Setting up the Active Directory/DNS/DHCP server
- Page 17 – Setting up the Exchange server
- Page 18 – Setting up the server for Groove Manager/SQL server; type and Flat files as the source format. Click Continue.
- Page 20 – Setting up the Groove Relay server
- Page 25 – Appendix A – Test system configuration information; System
- Page 33 – Appendix B – Instructions for running the application scenarios; The applications involved
- Page 35 – The application involved
- Page 37 – Viewing a slideshow while an HD video plays; Microsoft Windows Media Player 11; The data files involved; Possible shoot location, a 119MB folder with 50 JPEG images; The test process
- Page 38 – improper fades, and note all display issues.; All other product names are the trademarks of their
TEST REPORT
FEBRUARY 2006
Performance on Microsoft Windows Vista of Intel vPro
technology-based and AMD processor-based PCs in
common business scenarios
TEST REPORT
NOVEMBER 2006
KEY FINDINGS
z
The Intel
®
vPro
TM
technology based PC
with the Intel
®
Core
TM
2 Duo processor
E6700 yielded significant performance
advantages over the AMD Athlon 64 X2
5200+ processor-based PC on our
business tests.
z
The Intel vPro technology-based PC with
the Intel Core 2 Duo processor E6700
finished the tasks in our tests on average
1.45 times faster than the AMD Athlon 64
X2 5200+ processor-based PC.
z
The Intel vPro technology-based PC with
the Intel Core 2 Duo processor E6700 also
delivered better slideshow transitions and
higher HD video playback quality in our
dual-monitor test.
Executive summary
Intel Corporation (Intel) commissioned Principled
Technologies (PT) to compare the performance on Microsoft
Windows Vista of an Intel vPro technology-based PC with an
Intel Core 2 Duo processor E6700 with that of an AMD
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processor-based PC. We tested five
scenarios that featured real-time collaboration and
communication with Microsoft Office 2007 applications,
business intelligence and predictive modeling using
Microsoft Office Excel 2007 and Intuit QuickBooks Pro 2006,
and new interface features of Windows Vista. We compared
the performance of two platforms on these scenarios:
•
Intel vPro technology featuring an Intel Core 2 Duo
processor E6700 on an Intel DQ965GF motherboard
•
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processor on an
ASUSTek M2NBP-VM CSM motherboard
Figure 1 shows the normalized results for the foreground
tasks, the ones on which users typically wait for the system to respond, on the four test scenarios with numerical
results. As it shows, the Intel vPro technology-based PC with the Intel Core 2 Duo processor E6700 outperformed
the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processor-based system in all the test scenarios.
The Intel vPro technology-based PC with the Intel Core 2 Duo processor E6700 was from 1.14 times to 2.21
times faster on our foreground and background tasks than the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processor-based PC and
averaged 1.45 times faster across all the tasks. (In all comparisons in which we cite the average of task times, we
Figure 1: Normalized results for the foreground tasks on both test systems on four scenarios. Larger numbers indicate
better performance.
Overall performa nce gra ph
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
Co mm unicat io ns and
Co llabo ratio n
sc enario
Int uit QuickB o o ks
s cenario
Excel Recalculat io n
sc enario
M o nt e Carlo
s imulatio n
Scenarios
P
er
for
ma
nc
e
re
la
ti
ve
t
o
A
M
D
A
thl
on
64
X
2
5200+
p
ro
ces
so
r-
b
ased
P
C
A MD A thlon 64 X2 5200+
processor-based PC
Intel vPro technology based
PC w ith Intel Core 2 Duo
processor E6700
"Loading the manual" means you need to wait until the file loads and becomes available for online reading. Some manuals are very large, and the time they take to appear depends on your internet speed.
Other Manuals for Asus M2NBP-VM-CSM
Summary
3 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance on Microsoft Windows Vista of Intel vPro technology-based and AMD processor-based PCs in common business scenarios Application scenarios We chose five scenarios that involve common office applications, predictive modeling and business intelligence tasks, ...
4 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance on Microsoft Windows Vista of Intel vPro technology-based and AMD processor-based PCs in common business scenarios Running a Monte Carlo simulation in Microsoft Office Excel 2007 Jordan Michaels, a GMC auto dealer, believes that demand for new Envoys will...
5 Principled Technologies, Inc.: Performance on Microsoft Windows Vista of Intel vPro technology-based and AMD processor-based PCs in common business scenarios Figure 2: Median test times, in seconds, for both test systems on all five scenarios. Lower numbers are better. Test results and analysis In...
